Jump to content



Tired of ads? Register today to remove them.

Photo
- - - - -

Any impression on EX-85?


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Karen

Karen

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 4 posts
  • PlayStation Network ID:NW-A3000

Posted 31 March 2007 - 09:33 AM

I saw them in Singapore for around S$88 (58US$)... They also had EX-90 for around S$165 (108US$)
How does EX-85 compared to EX-90 or EX-81?
FYI, I have an EX-81.

Edited by Karen, 31 March 2007 - 09:34 AM.


#2 IpaqMan

IpaqMan

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • PlayStation Network ID:NW-E005F

Posted 28 May 2007 - 11:08 AM

I have both the MDR-EX90LP and the MDR-EX85SL. To my ears, they EX85s sound about the same as the EX90. The EX85s are less expensive because of less expensive components and less sound quality testing. I have been using the EX85s the most because they are lighter, have a short cord, and a more robust strain relief on the earbud.

The EX90 and EX85 are the best earbuds that I have ever used in terms of sound quality, comfort, and stay in the ear quality. My other earbuds have included the CX300, EX71, EX81, MD33, MX500, and E3C.

The EX81 sounded very similar to the EX71. Personally, I did not like the over the ear piece of the EX81. The EX71 has a very strong bass. The bass seems to overwhelm the other frequencies. The EX90 has an excellent bass that does not drown out other frequencies. The EX90 is significantly better sounding than the EX71/81. Because of the driver design, the EX90 tends to stay in my ear much better than the EX71 did.

IMHO, for about the same price, the EX85 is a much better value than the EX71/81.

#3 Karen

Karen

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 4 posts
  • PlayStation Network ID:NW-A3000

Posted 17 December 2007 - 02:00 AM

Thanks! I'll be getting EX85

#4 Guest_Stuge_*

Guest_Stuge_*
  • Guests

Posted 17 December 2007 - 03:02 AM

QUOTE(IpaqMan @ May 28 2007, 09:38 PM) View Post
less sound quality testing.

hmm ,where did you read this ? unsure.gif

#5 ceres

ceres

    Death from Above - 1979

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 259 posts
  • Location:m
  • PlayStation Network ID:706 violet, 818 black

Posted 17 December 2007 - 06:02 AM

QUOTE(Stuge @ Dec 17 2007, 09:02 AM) View Post
hmm ,where did you read this ? unsure.gif



Ex-85 and Ex-90 are very close in SQ with crisper highs on the 90s. EX 85 are a great deal.

#6 markey

markey

    Competent Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 600 posts
  • Location:m
  • PlayStation Network ID:PS3; NWZ-A818; NW-A806; NW-S706F; NW-A1200; NW-HD5; MZN-505

Posted 08 February 2008 - 09:40 AM

QUOTE(ceres @ Dec 17 2007, 11:02 AM) View Post
Ex-85 and Ex-90 are very close in SQ with crisper highs on the 90s. EX 85 are a great deal.

How would you compare MDR-EX82's (as supplied with A8xx range) with MDR-EX90's. I would imagine EX82's being similiar to EX85's?


#7 Guest_Stuge_*

Guest_Stuge_*
  • Guests

Posted 08 February 2008 - 03:16 PM

I have used EX85 .IMO they are just an Ok earphones .

#8 markey

markey

    Competent Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 600 posts
  • Location:m
  • PlayStation Network ID:PS3; NWZ-A818; NW-A806; NW-S706F; NW-A1200; NW-HD5; MZN-505

Posted 08 February 2008 - 03:56 PM

QUOTE(Stuge @ Feb 8 2008, 08:16 PM) View Post
I have used EX85 .IMO they are just an Ok earphones .

How much better are the EX90's compared to the EX82'/85's, are they worth the extra $$$?

Edited by markey, 08 February 2008 - 08:44 PM.


#9 markey

markey

    Competent Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 600 posts
  • Location:m
  • PlayStation Network ID:PS3; NWZ-A818; NW-A806; NW-S706F; NW-A1200; NW-HD5; MZN-505

Posted 10 February 2008 - 11:45 AM

QUOTE(markey @ Feb 8 2008, 08:56 PM) View Post
How much better are the EX90's compared to the EX82'/85's, are they worth the extra $$$?

Well I just splashed out £70 GBP on these. I'll let you know my thoughts in time.

#10 Guest_Stuge_*

Guest_Stuge_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 February 2008 - 01:09 PM

QUOTE(markey @ Feb 10 2008, 10:15 PM) View Post
Well I just splashed out £70 GBP on these. I'll let you know my thoughts in time.


Look forward to your comments .

#11 aafuss

aafuss

    Well-Versed

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 217 posts
  • Location:http://babyasoftwaregroup.googlepages.com
  • PlayStation Network ID:MZ-R700,MZ-N510

Posted 08 April 2008 - 05:48 AM

Just got myself the EX85 for $90-compared to Sony's RRP of $130.

Were $150 in Australia originally.

Comes wth a nice fabric draw-string pouch and earphone holder (larger than the holder supplied with the EX32LP).


SQ-amazingly clear and distortion free, has nicely perfected sound across various frequencies.

I listened to pop music on my iPod with the EX85's-very rich sound.

Much better than Apple earbuds.

The design is unusual, but after a while it is extremely comfortable to wear. For my ears, I put on the large size tips included.

Tips-replacements are EP-EX1 and may also fit other EX series headphones.

In conclusion, I enjoyed listening to music with these headphones greatly.

Edited by A.A. Fussy, 08 April 2008 - 06:29 AM.


#12 pata2001

pata2001

    CLIMAX FORM

  • Valued Contributors
  • 745 posts
  • PlayStation Network ID:D-NE9, D-NE20, NW-E3, NW-E99, NW-S705F, MZ-N510, MZ-S1, MZ-E720, MZ-DH710, MZ-DH10P, MZ-RH1, PSP

Posted 08 April 2008 - 02:07 PM

I've been using the EX85 for months now. In short, it's simply a glorified EX71. It has better bass and highs than the EX71 (not as harsh), but the mids are still drowned. Simply inferior to IEMs, even the cheap models of Shure/Ultimate ears that can be had for similar price. Isolation is not great either due to the angled piece. I imported the SL version (which is why I'm still using it). It's fancy and turns a few heads on the street, but SQ wise, one can do better elsewhere. Only for those that prefers Sony's sound signature or those that thinks bass and no mids is good sound quality.
http://www.audiotsta...ead.php?t=35514




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users