Jump to content

kino170878

Members
  • Posts

    300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by kino170878

  1. It's actually a very difficult question you are asking. There are different uses for both bit rates. You therefore have to make a decision on what you want to use minidiscs for.

    From just a sound quality perspective I think 352kps may be marginally better, but SP has full stereo so it may depend in the end on the tracks themselves.

    I think, however, that the key to solving this is your *other* deck. Is it also a Sony SP deck? In that case having a number of decks in the same format would make more sense than getting an Onkyo Hi-MD deck. But your setup may allow both formats to exist side by side, so I can't say for sure.

    Basically it's this: if you want to invest in decks I would go the SP route; if you want to invest in portables go Hi-MD. If you want the best sound quality possible without the advantages of the minidisc format go PCM (uncompressed WAV).

  2. Does anybody here have experience of applying stickers to minidiscs? What methods do you use? Were you successfully able to use the reverse of the disc as well?

    I am asking these questions with a view of creating a huge number of MDs including artwork, track info, and so on. I may also need to re-apply stickers if the contents of the MDs change.

    I will be applying stickers to the discs themselves and not their cases, at least initially.

    Any help or ideas appreciated.

  3. Does anybody here have experience of applying stickers to minidiscs? What methods do you use? Were you successfully able to use the reverse of the disc as well?

    I am asking these questions with a view of creating a huge number of MDs including artwork, track info, and so on. I may also need to re-apply stickers if the contents of the MDs change.

    I will be applying stickers to the discs themselves and not their cases, at least iniitally.

    Any help or ideas appreciated.

  4. I am very interested in sound quality and I am always comparing teh different codecs. Yesterday I listend to the same cd on both HI-SP (352 kb) and normal SP.

    SP sounded better to my ears.

    It's very interesting you would say that because there are some forum members here who say the opposite i.e. that it is Atrac3+ 352 which is better than SP 292. There is a frequency analysis thread by Avrin for example which demonstrates that the 352 rate is able to capture some of the very high frequencies better than SP can.

    I think one reason which could explain why SP may in fact sound better is that Atrac SP uses true stereo (co-designed with Dolby) whereas the new Atrac uses 'joint stereo'. At high rates supposedly joint stereo works just as good if not better but your result shows that this may not always be the case.

  5. Currently we think that the units simply don't have firmware commands they can respond with to actually send bulk data. They can clearly send header info, but that's not enough. Seems likely the software limitation is in the firmware of the device.

    So what you are saying is that different minidisc units, specifically RH1 vs all the rest, have different firmware limitations inside?

    That would seem to me to go against Sony's principle of having backward compatability. My own theory is that *all* minidisc units that can connect to a computer should be able to upload data. I can recall reading one of Avrin's threads where the RH710 (which cannot record in Atrac3 natively) was able to be hacked to record in SP. Perhaps every possibility is therefore hidden within the hardware and you just have to find out how it can be manipulated by the software.

  6. Sure, you can get them there. But you won't be able to play them back :)

    But the Hi-MD unit can play SP if it is recorded by the unit itself. I thought cbmuser said that if the hardware side can support it then the software will be able to do it too. So why can't it work?

  7. Clearly there is a problem with making SP disks, however 256k and 352k are much better than LP2, so should sound great (however you seem to want LP2 as the compatibility base, and I agree with you, LP2 is "good enough" most of the time). However the linux-minidisc crowd now have an SP codec for ffmpeg, and this will make it possible to generate *real* SP disks from the PC. Not sure how soon, but soon, I think.

    This sounds great, so will we be able to transfer SP tracks from the PC to 1GB Hi-MD discs thereby getting 5 hours of SP audio on one disc?

  8. On studio equipment (including a handful of MD decks) Coaxial digital connections can carry a purer signal (less potential distortion) than the optical digital connection, even though some people claim to prefer the "cleaner" sound of optical. AES-EBU supposedly carries the best signal but that's only what I've read, I can't confirm it since I never had access to such expensive equipment. Overall I doubt you could hear it unless you had a million dollar studio/audiophile set-up.

  9. I always found non-Sony equipment to be louder. My Aiwa F80 sounds almost twice as loud as any Sony MD portable I have. Try and research the models and see if you can pick up a good condition second-hand one on ebay.

    Also check out "S.F. Edit" mode on legacy Sony MD decks, this can boost the volume of the track/s in question. Be aware that this particular edit operation is irreversable and it only works with tracks recorded in SP - you can't do it for LP2 tracks. And if you are on Hi-MD then you can forget about this operation altogether since it doesn't exist on the Hi-MD units. The only workaround there might be too normalize the original WAV or MP3 tracks using either Audacity or MP3Gain before converting them to Atrac3plus and finally to the MD via Sonicstage.

  10. Just saw White Noise with Michel Keaton, there is a scene about twenty minutes in with the first EVT recorder playing Michael a minidisc of EVP (Electronic Voice Phenomena). Couldn't figure out which unit it was, will watch again and pause.

    Good movie BTW

    Bob

    That is the MZ-R37. It's full metal body and overall sleek look may have been the reason the producers decided to include it in the movie B)

×
×
  • Create New...