DD

I have noticed that, compared with the total SS work (SS do both ripping and converting), I had the EAC instead of SS to do the ripping. My workmate and I cannot tell the difference between the two ".wav"s, but we both acknowleged that the A3+256 from the EAC wav is better than the one from SS. Do anyone agree?

Consider about the lower Bitrate compared with 292K SP, I doubt it.

I can not open that page. I wonder what kind of ATRAC3 coder they used? It is said that the ATRAC3 coder in OPENMG is some of different with that in chips of walkman, and I like the latter. I also wonder that, why sony used a poorer coder in their PC software?

I have been using MDR-E888. Which Offer a natural fine sound with fairly low cost.

Oh yes! But my idea was merely that: If there would be any ways to let Simple Burner work more efficiently? :wink:

How silly it was, TOC edit TWICE while single track copied. If I had many of short tracks, It would waste all time in moving My N10's pickup back and forth! :x Compare with SonicStage. With a full charged battary and AC power linked, SonicStage can write all of the songs uninterruptedly and finished with a single TOC edit. 8)

Reading the MZ-N10 service manual, I noticed that, compared with R900, there is a new member among the error messages -----"MD DATA 2 READ Error"! Would this be a hint about the new tec.?

I've got a R900. When I record music from optic or analog, I can monitor that music via the headphone output. My question would be: has the monitor voice been ATRACed, or not?

of each one. Could anyone who had heard all of them give me a summarization?

Good News! If Mini Disks differ in prize(quality), then could it differ in data preservation? What kind of Mini Disk do you often use? I mean brand, plus series.

As the viewpoint of SONY, more than 30years , 1 million times of reuse. Could it be really? give me your advice ok?

Thanks a lot 8)

then what is the latest model?