pinkfloydian

lastly i send it someone else. and i can easly say that it is not good alternative for mp3 players. it is a good recorder but not very good player. sony should work some more. lastly: if you are a musician it is perfect for rec. but if you just want to listen it is not worse to buy because of playing sound quality and limitations. i hate sony.

thank you so much. but it is really not good to rec as a pcm. i find what i should do. i went to the int. cafe. and downloaded 192 kbps mp3s. they are better now. but i think hi-md s are not for me. i will sell it and will use my old discman.

why nobody helps me? Did i do something wrong?

Ok. Sorry for my entry. i did'nt know. but i think my problem is not solved. what i am saying is my players sound quality is something like mp3 64 kbps when i encode them in atrac 105 kbps. i don't have any background noise but i can't hear the song very good. in electronic music it is really great. really beats. but wwhen i try something rocky it is really bad and unable to listen. especially in old songs of pink floyd and led zeppelin. and i was listening them most of day. when i use discman it is not very good about bass. but i could fell the sound all the songs. thanks for any helps. muhammed another way to ask: what should i do for having the best sound from 128 kbps mp3s in md. it is enough to play them like my old discman.

HI. I USED SONY CD-MP3 PLAYER SO I HAVE A LOTS OF MP3 CDS. BUT I BOUGHT MZ-RH10 BECAUSE OF DISCMANS SIZE. I HEARD LOTS OF THING ABOUT SOUND QUALITY OF MD S. BUT WHEN I CONVERT MY MP3 S(MOST OF THEM ARE 128 KBPS AND I CONVERT THEM TO 105KBPS ATRAC) IT WAS REALLY BAD AND MY OLD DISCMAN IS BETTER ABOUT SOUND. DID I DO SOMETHING WRONG?? AND WHEN I TRIED NOT TO CONVERT THEM AND SAVE AS MP3 IT WAS REALLY BAD SOUNDING.IT IS PLAYING AS A RADIO WHAT SHOULD I DO? WHAT I DID WRONG???????? SORRY FOR MY VERY VERY BAD ENGLISH