JamesW Posted October 12, 2004 Report Share Posted October 12, 2004 I need a small portable device for recording four tracks simultaneously, and of the few around - Tascam, Zoom etc - they all can only record a maximum of two tracks simultaneously, whereas I'd like to record three of four tracks at once (at my band rehearsals). There are some recorders that can record 4 or more tracks simultaneously, but these tend to be the high-end expensive models and aren't so portable either. So I've had an idea: why not use two minidisc recorders, with two mics going into one MD (for tracks 1 and 2), and two into the other (for tracks 3 and 4), in oreder to record four musicians. Then when I transfer both stereo recordings to my computer / digital audio workstation, all I need to do is separate all four tracks and then align them so that they're all sync'd together. This way I'll end up with four separately recorded tracks for mixing / overdubbing etc. Has anyone any thoughts on the above? I did wonder if one recorder might recorder a fraction faster than the other, or otherwise cause sync problems. Possibly a flanging effect might occur when all four tracks are played back together on the computer. I'm ust wondering if it's worth splashing out another £100 on a second MD recorder. Thanks in advance. (I'm also not sure where to post this hence adding it to more than one forum - sorry!) JamesW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bananatree Posted October 12, 2004 Report Share Posted October 12, 2004 Yes, this would work, although I've never tried syncing 4 tracks. I've only done remixes using stereo->Mono dubbing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.