Jump to content

Laser wear and tear: real time vs usb transfer

Rate this topic


tw

Recommended Posts

Howdy all. Here's a hopefully not too stupid technical question maybe someone can answer...

In my experience the optical block in MDs is pretty fragile and I'm sure that even if it wasn't, the laser has a finite lifespan.

My question is, does real time recording wear the laser out sooner than USB transfer? To put it another way: it takes say 20 minutes to transfer 5 hours of HiSP music using SS or SB, writing 800Mb or so of data. If I record 5 hours of HiSP music in real time is the laser firing for the whole 5 hours, or does it just fire for the time taken to write the 800Mb (20 minutes)?

If the answer is "real time stresses the laser" I might have to consider getting a windows box!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There shouldn't be a difference, as Hi-MD units write in bursts anyway, as the possible datarate is much higher than what codec and converters deliver. Plus, the data is buffered too...

However, real-time recording delivers a better quality, than what SonicStage creates. Especially at low bitrates(Hi-LP/LP2/LP4).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...