Avrin Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Tested it (on Depeche Mode's "The Best of Vol.1"). Sounds like a good Type I (Normal) Compact Cassette (there was that standard in 1970's) recorded by a good cassette deck. An old friend of mine (an iRiver fan) was shaken by the sheer sound quality of the album played at this bitrate by my good old RH10. I really like the sound of ATRAC3@105. It has finally found its way on HiMD!!! No more 41 kbit/s padding!!!And I'm a DVD-Audio fan.And I am a vinyl collector. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobt Posted November 26, 2006 Report Share Posted November 26, 2006 As I always say sometimes, let your ears be your guide, and if it sounds good enough for what you need, then it is good enough for what you need.I Think,Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avrin Posted November 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2006 (edited) bobt, you are exactly right. I mostly use ATRAC3plus@192 (and sometimes ATRAC3plus@256 for really complicated and fast music) for the music I listen at home through my Hi-Fi stereo system. Sounds excellent, has almost no artifacts (and I know what good quality is), and adequate disc capacity. But for the music to listen in a noisy street, or on the subway, ATRAC3@105 really shines. Yes, it was useless for MDs with its padding up to the size of ATRAC3@132, but since there is no padding on HiMD, it is excellent with its 20+ hours on a HiMD blank and 6+ hours on an MD one. A single MD dics full of ATRAC3@105 is more than enough for a day's travel, while 3 hours of ATRAC3plus@192 is frequently not.And the way ATRAC3@105 sounds reminds me of the good old days of cassette players. Edited November 26, 2006 by Avrin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafiki031 Posted November 26, 2006 Report Share Posted November 26, 2006 Why the ATRAC@105 is dissapear in the SS 4.0 to transfer in old MDs(NetMD)?... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avrin Posted November 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2006 (edited) It is completely useless on NetMD, unless you already have files encoded at this bitrate. If you have a CD, you'd better rip the tracks to ATRAC3@132, and put those on NetMD - you'll use the same disc space, but will get better quality.But if you want to use ATRAC3@105 with HiMD, it is a different story. Rip the CD at this bitrate (use the registry hack described here http://forums.minidisc.org/index.php?showtopic=15928 to enable ripping to ATRAC3@105 again - it works with SS42 also), and transfer the tracks to the disc - you'll get adequate quality using less space. Edited November 26, 2006 by Avrin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.