bigboki

Yesterday I tried AAL, and it produce between 30% and 50% larger files then flac. I tried also compress into AAL decompress back to wav, and at the first try I've got different sizes BUT then I realize that I added album/song info into the ALL compressed files. When I did ALL compress for decompressed WAV and then decompress of those files I've got exactly the same files. But since compression size wise is 30 to 50% worse then FLAC, I don't plan to use it for now. Sincerely yours Bojan

I've got two HiMD transparent blue discs from FutureShop at Yonge & Dundas in Toronto. Price was 11.99 before taxes. Sony Store at Eaton didn't have them, and I needed them urgently. Sincerely yours Bojan

You are (of course) right! Thank you very much for pointing this to me! Sincerely yours Bojan

Thank you for your responses!!! I've already known the differences between this 2 units, however, it seems that one missed me completely. Correct me if I'm wrong, but NH900 can operate both on gumstick battery and with AA using attachment. And RH910 doesn't have an attachement for the AA battery and can operate only using gumstick battery. Considering the prices, I know that they are high (here in Canada), but that's the fact of life here. (and you have to add 15% of GST + PST on that price). The difference between Canadian and US is not big enough, because of s&h expences. For the microphone, I'll try to search the forum more! Thank you once more, Sincerely yours Bojan

Please help me! Here in Toronto, Canada, I can get NH900 for 299CAD (237USD) at Sony store or RH910 for 259CAD (209USD) at www.minidisc-canada.com. Which one will be overall better for live recording of church choir reherseals in PCM/WAV? Please suggest me some microphone to go with one of them for that purpose as well. Thank you very much in advance, Sincerely yours Bojan

I'm also really interested if there are any differences in recording quality between 1st and 2nd generation units. Please, owners of both, can you enlighten us? Thanks in advance