Jump to content

Improvements with future Hi-MD units?

Rate this topic


SeineSeeker

Recommended Posts

It should remember the RecVolume (Automatic/Manual) setting between recordings.

Better readable, bigger display.

Faster response, faster seek times.

LP2@132k directly usable in Hi-MD mode standalone recording.

A new Super-SP-mode, giving 80 minutes playing time on a 74 minute disk in a quality well above the old SP-mode.

Replace the 'joystick' with regular, well sized buttons.

Separate buttons for Edit and Display-mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A new Super-SP-mode, giving 80 minutes playing time on a 74 minute disk in a quality well above the old SP-mode. 

Well above the old SP-mode?

As poven by many, the quality of "old SP" is pretty damn good!

http://www.hifichoice.co.uk/review_read.asp?ID=1873

Below is a clip from this MD review:

http://www.minidisc.org/near_cd.html

We ran this A-B testing during two separate sessions encompassing a total period of three hours. After the testing was completed we were satisfied that we could neither identify, nor could we hear any difference between the digital original and the digitally recorded MiniDisc, or the manufacturer's own pre-recorded version of that same disc. 

And i agree with them! Which is why i have gone back to "Old SP" mode recording!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well above the old SP-mode?

As proven by many, the quality of "old SP" is pretty damn good!

Since we have more space on the discs due to the new recording technique, it would allow for a higher headroom in multi generation copying, plus, we have a mode, that would be transparent to even the most critical ear.

I know, the ES-series where very good, but with the advancements towards Hi-Res audio, it would be good, when Minidisc improves as well.

I'd rather choose a Super-SP mode over PCM, since at 450kBit, the quality would be very close to PCM, but with a decent playing time on standard discs.

Could uploading of analog recordings on old MDs be a feature they could add in the future? Assuming they wanted to, though it seems they don't.

Don't hope for that. Reason 1: Existing prefabs. Despite the fact, that the recorders can detect the media type without additional holes in the shell.

Reason 2: No digital flag. And Sony refuses to honor SCMS in this regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main problem with Hi-MD is the fact that it is soooo sloooww!

Why, for instance when transfering music does it write to the TOC after ever track?! Recording in real-time doesnt do this so why when using the PC?

In fact the whole process of converting and transfering music is very poorly excuted by SonicStage. The way it will convert a track then write it, then convert and write.....Why not Convert and write all tracks simultaniously? Doing this and without the silly TOC writing every track would more than half the time it takes to transfer 1Gig of music!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better build quality - the NH900 should have been more like the N910, ie. all metal, slimmer, etc.

No more crippling on lower end portables - 5mW x 2 across the range, please.

Wider range of home equipment, like the current standard-MD range: decks, mini/micro systems and so on.

We've only got the LAM-X1, which by all accounts isn't very good...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...