I have read from many sources that ATRAC3plus @ 64kbps has the same sound quality as MP3 @ 128kbps.
So I assumed that @192 kbps the ATRAC2plus will sound much better than MP3 @ 192kbps(which is the average bitrate of my mp3 collection).
So I coverted all of my collection into ATRAC3plus directrly from MP3. But now as I listen to the same file in the two formats with same bitrates I don't seem to notice any difference even with a high-end earphones. Is it just me?
My questions are:
1. Does Atrac3plus 192kbps sound better than MP3 @192 if ripped directly from a CD?
2. And does it sound better if converted from the original MP3 file?
Question
chupacabra314
I have read from many sources that ATRAC3plus @ 64kbps has the same sound quality as MP3 @ 128kbps.
So I assumed that @192 kbps the ATRAC2plus will sound much better than MP3 @ 192kbps(which is the average bitrate of my mp3 collection).
So I coverted all of my collection into ATRAC3plus directrly from MP3. But now as I listen to the same file in the two formats with same bitrates I don't seem to notice any difference even with a high-end earphones. Is it just me?
My questions are:
1. Does Atrac3plus 192kbps sound better than MP3 @192 if ripped directly from a CD?
2. And does it sound better if converted from the original MP3 file?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.