DJ SKuBa

so heres the big question... does the rh10 have a line out or not... it seems that everyoen is discussing what it is but for some of us who acutally want a line out i think it may be the determining factor for buying the rh10. me for example so the question now is wether this rh10 is the equivalent of the nh900 plus the ne display... to me it seemed liek hte nh900 was a great piece but the ony thing the rh10 has is mp3 and a display... is it so ie, is it the nh900 plus these added features or did they take away the lineout or can you still change the feature in the soft menu for a line out

i noticed on the equipment section of this site it says that the 1st gen hi md is shared line and headphone output but on the new models ie the 910 and the 10 it says that there is only headphone...whats the deal with that... i know they havent come out in the us yet but mabey someone knows?

is it just me or does the rh10 not have usb on the unit, and wheres the mic input and line output.... or is that on a different section of the unit

Im lookin to purchase a nh900 with all the accessories it comes with. if anyone has one please contact me asap... thanx... cheers

so heres the big question for me that will sell me on the 900 or the new generation... as far as usb is concerned... can you record thru the usb on the new ones ... since i see it as an option on the site..

funny... the description on this site doesnt say hi deff digi amp... thats what i was basing it on... ps does anyone know when the results from the meeting with sony will be posted

seriously, as far as im concerend, aluminum or magnesium it really dont matter... i dont plan on smashing it aroudn with a sledge hammer anywyaz.... adn i had that magnesium cd player the mad thin one.. and honeslty its not such an "amazing" feature.... id opt for acutual features vs its case...

its somewhat funny that there is so much "controversey" regarding which to get... i mean i think i heard the 900 only has a digi amp while the nh1 has a HD digi amp... its crazy the difference that people notice.. wit this being the case i might as well just wait around for the new ones with pretty mjch the same features but a backlit display... idk im gonna do alot of recording with this and i need that pcm mode more than anything... and batterylife is a plus... and the usb connection to the computer... so what you guys think... NH1 or NH900 or hell... just wait for hte new ones? in theory i could "tough out" a lesser display perhaps for a better unit but it seems to me that the 900 is acutally better and the only thing the nh1 has is its metal, a bit smaller, and has a better remote... and is also 100 bux mroe... but the basic functions seem the same ps, does anyone know if the 900 has a lock mode since the jog dial may become a slight problem... since i wil lbe using this live i dont need anyone rubbing against it and screwiing up my set... and is it possible to use the nh1 remote on the 900 cuz it sems to me that hte 900 might acutlaly be better feature wise specificlalyh the usb on the unit...

Hey, for all of us who may not be buyin gen 2 hi md and waiting for that price drop, could anyone explain the differences between the nh1 and the nh900. i noticed that the nh900 has a display on it while the nh1 does not, and it also has a jog dial, in addition the charger stand does not have a usb adapter. anything else?... i mean i dont wanna be relying on a remote for most of my usage so any suggestions?...

would you be willing to sell the NH1 vs trade?

tru tru, i havent bought one yet but its either the nh900/nh1 but if theres a difference mabey ill get the new ones.... hmmmm what to do... anyone know when there will be some new details out on the new series if theres any testers?

hey,besides the visual display and mp3 capabilities adn the little cosmetic differences, what is the difference between the RH10 and the NH1 as far as recording quality, amp power, playback quality. i mean it seems to me that besdies these cosmetic differences the genral piece is the same. they all have the same inputs and usb capabilites less teh 2.0 difference, and its seems the yall encode and play back in the same format. is there any quality differecne in the volume of the digital amp or the eq or the acutal sound? i havent bought one yet but its like, if there is no difference as far as sound quality why purchase one that has mp3 format adn just a different display?...

whats the difference between the rh10/910 and the nh series

well i guess i could wait a month, i mean i guess what ill do is hit up these forums again to see what you guys think about the new ones since as you know, i know nothing... i searched the site and noticed there was a MZ-RH910 and a MZ-RH10 just wondering what the difference is between those adn the NH-900 or the NH1 or if there is any difference... its just gets more and more complicated i think lol.

wow you do know your MD's well. im honestly not even looking to get MP3s uploaded only std wav. files since mp3s are compressed and encoded already which removes some of hte sound quality. so basicaly what your saying is that if i get the 900 ill be good to go as far as sound quality, recording, and playback. i hope ur right but im gonna go with you on this one. any suggestions where i can get the 900 mad cheap?

i see how it works... so it is possible to delete the track marks and if the songs are already on my computer EVEN IF THEY HAVE A 2 SECOND GAP... if i go usb it will not recognize the gap and will be streamless... keep in mind my purpose for using this, if the timing isnt correct all the music gets messed up since those 2 secosd are timed to the song if u know hwat i mean. so the 900 or the 910 would do the trick as far as what im looking to do...and what is the NH1? obviously i knwo NOTHING here so please forgive me...i wonder, will optical also act the same as usb or would it act as analog. This is since my system is running with a recording interfacte which can output in pretyt much everthing but USB... convenient no, but i think that probably will do the trick... as far as quality, i want to be able to set all the recording parameters myself vs have it automatically set, is that possible... pretty much want to have this so i can do ti all myself and dont want any SONY parameters... and last thing... is there a "silent mode" in which EVERY click of a button doesnt have a "beep" following it etc. sicne this will be used live i think the beep is rather unprofessional if u knwo what i mean. so can i just have it so that no matter what i do its silent untill the songs play....thanx for ur help btw been VERRRY well, helpful ...

im not looking really for live recording in the sense that you guys may be thinking... i think most people use them for recording concerts, i will be recording like 10 second sount clips or whatever for dj samples... OR i will be recording through a cable either analog or digital.... and the problem is that i hear sony puts track marcks every 2 second gaps exist.... that may be a big problem since baiscally what im going ot be doing is recording from my computer my prerecorded songs and playing htem back live...

Im not necessarily looking for easy upload to the computer since 99 percent of the time it is going the other way, from the computer to the MD, but USB may be helpful there.. What im concerend about is the recording and playback quality. from alot of these reviews it says sharp is better because it allows the user to pretty much control just about everthing as far as recording goes. I heard the preamps are better and it has louder outputs... idk what to do... its funny, your the 1st person who said sony is good for recording... I mean basically i want a recorder, recording the best quality possible totally uncompressed at 44.1, the output i just want powerful. Some i hear have heavier bass or treble. Im looking for a TOTALLY FLAT output, somethin which has no frequency stronger than the other. Also i noticed that sony recorers input track marks every time 2 secons of silence occur and do not start at the end of the medium. Problem is that some recordings may have mutliple secons of silnece and are necessary to be there but not a new track.... oh boy, Its crazy cuz thers so much out there... what do we think about Sharp MD-DR77 or the 722....

no budget... its pretty much if its worth it ill get it.. keep in mind that i will be using this for professional recording and play back... pretty much using it for concerts. So im gonna be needing digital inputs, uncompressed recording etc etc... pretty much im looking for somethin thats portable but a beast... recording quality must be like crystal... hope u can help ... i heard the sharp 722 and the 888 and those 700s adn 800s are good. Put it this way... i will also be using this to play back pre recorded materials for large crowds and i need to be POSITIVE... it will NOT skip or pause or anything...

Hey, im totallly new to minidisc but im looking for something portable that has the best recording features, bascially to use as a recorder to get random sounds and stuff. I also am looking for soemthing that has good playback time and exteremely high quality since i will be using it for live performances. I hear sharp makes the best recorders but i dont knwo where to start... any suggestions..