kungfool Posted April 10, 2005 Report Share Posted April 10, 2005 (edited) Here are all my pictures of the MZ-RH10 SilverEnjoy:http://kung.111mb.com/minidisc.php Edited April 10, 2005 by kungfool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZ-NH1 Posted April 10, 2005 Report Share Posted April 10, 2005 Lol... looks very nice indeed!It also looks like you have about 5 different coloured MD's there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kungfool Posted April 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2005 Yeah, its looks really depend on the lighting, and I never carry a mirror with me, but now if I'm out and I need to check my hair or something I got this little beauty. (j/k not that vain) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZ-NH1 Posted April 10, 2005 Report Share Posted April 10, 2005 Ahahahah!!! nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
projektdrift Posted April 11, 2005 Report Share Posted April 11, 2005 North America still isnt getting lcds on the remotes, are we?... i want that lcd remote haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kungfool Posted April 11, 2005 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2005 Yeah the North American model's remote only has buttons, no lcd. They always sell a step-down version remote in North Amerca because most Americans don't have a use for the expensive kanji features of the Japanese remotes. Is it true that the only color being release in North America is black? I tired to find out, and all the American eTailers only sell black models. Does anyone know if black is the only color? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matrulesok Posted April 11, 2005 Report Share Posted April 11, 2005 Very cool pictures ! Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NRen2k5 Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 I'd like to know once you've tried it out... Does the RH10 play MP3's gaplessly? If not, roughly how much silence is there between the end of one song and the beginning of the next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kungfool Posted April 12, 2005 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 I'd like to know once you've tried it out... Does the RH10 play MP3's gaplessly? If not, roughly how much silence is there between the end of one song and the beginning of the next?←I tested it out and attached an mp3 file of the results to this post(played the split track into line-in) there is a note that plays twice and has a gap in the middle each time. the first time it plays is the Hi-LP gap, the second time it plays is the mp3-160gap[attachmentid=195]Here is the important information:Hi-LP gap: 160ms (.160 seconds)mp3-160 gap: 122ms (.122 seconds)I measured these gaps using GoldWave(I only tested once so this wasn't an average of the gap or anything, but it seemed to be the same each time I played it)(Also this was done with the quickmode setting turned on, but it also didn't seem any different with it off)Hope this helps to answer your question RH10_Hi_LP__mp3_160_gap_test.mp3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bug80 Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 (edited) Huh, shouldn't Hi-LP be totally gapless? Or at most something around a couple of milliseconds?kungfool, two questions:1) what was your original signal, an audio CD or two wave files?2) did you encode the files in one run, or seperate? Edited April 12, 2005 by bug80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kungfool Posted April 12, 2005 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 (edited) Original signal was one wav file, I made it using Propellorhead Reason, it's just a long note...Then I split the wav file using GoldWave so that it spread across two wav files...Then I encoded each wav file using CDex into mp3-160 (lame)Then loaded them into Sonic Stage 3.0 (JP) and downloaded them to the RH10 leaving them as mp3, then downloaded a copy of the tracks (still encoded into mp3) letting Sonic Stage convert them into Hi-LP as it transferred.Played back all four tracks (two notes x split in half) into line-in and recorded the results...Then preceded to measure the size of the gap back in goldwave...Then encoded the line-in results as mp3-32-mono (lame) for upload to the internet. Edited April 12, 2005 by kungfool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bug80 Posted April 13, 2005 Report Share Posted April 13, 2005 Ok, that explains something, because CDeX doesn't encode gapless in my experience. In other words, the MP3's you transfered to your unit weren't gapless, that explains the short silence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kungfool Posted April 14, 2005 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 Oops, I didn't know CDex doesn't encode gapless... Can you recommend an encoder that would produce a gapless mp3 so I could do an accurate test? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMPlitude Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 guys, guys theres always gonna be a gap of some sort, whether big or small Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zerodB Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 Oops, I didn't know CDex doesn't encode gapless... Can you recommend an encoder that would produce a gapless mp3 so I could do an accurate test?←Umm... There is no such thing as gapless MP3. MP3 will have gaps by it's very nature. Some DAPs however, are clever and circumvent the gaps by detecting null signals, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latexxx Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 Umm... There is no such thing as gapless MP3. MP3 will have gaps by it's very nature. Some DAPs however, are clever and circumvent the gaps by detecting null signals, etc.←But Lame adds information, which is necessary to remove the gap, in file headers.On the other hand, there is no such thing as gapless atrac. Atrac(3/plus) just appears to be gapless because is has same block length as cd audio thus producing gapless results from cd sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bug80 Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 (edited) But Lame adds information, which is necessary to remove the gap, in file headers.Yes that's what I mean. Gapless MP3's don't exist, but gapless MP3 playback does. CDex doesn't include information that is necessary for this to happen. I wonder if SonicStage will read it anyway, but that's another story. Edited April 14, 2005 by bug80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zerodB Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 (edited) Point conceded, Latexxx. (I'd argue tho, that for all intensive purposes, ATRAC3/+ is gapless). Edited April 15, 2005 by zerodB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidedney123 Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 Hi As someone who has actually handled one of these new recorders, can you tell me if it's as thick as it looks? In all the photos it seems to be noticeably fatter than previous generation MD recorders, but it's hard to gauge stuff like that without handling one.Cheers,Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kungfool Posted April 17, 2005 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2005 It is a little fatter than other modern MD portables. I checked and it seems like its exactly 4 minidiscs thick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.