Jump to content

Best Live recording: Sharp -SR60 or MD-MT280E

Rate this topic


Raf

Recommended Posts

Hi there

I was thinking yesterday that I need something to record our live band practices. I suddenly thought what about MD.

I found this site and started to educate myself on what is needed. The live recordings I have listened to, from this site, are really clear and good.

I have decided to get an MD player just for live recording. The prices on ebay look good for secondhand ones.

From what I gather the sharp are a little bit better for live recording.

So does anyone know which is best between the

Sharp MD-SR60 or Sharp MD-MT280E ??

Any advice would be great.

Cheers

Raf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd shell out a little more for a low end himd with a mic/line input an nh700 or rh710 would be perfect & give you the option of digital uuploading to a computer for later editing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a battery box (+ using the line-in) will rpevent the mic preamp of the MD distorting on loud sounds (like an indoor rock/metal show)... I love the combo, but others (like A440) swear by a gizmo called an attenuator (often just a headphone volume control cord 'misused') that lowers the signal so the mic-in preamp doesn't clip... but this lowers the frequency range and max sound level the mics themselves can handle a bit

I love te batt-box for live rec'ing loud shows and I have only had good results with it (PS I use the greenmachine stuff... very simple and simply great!!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A battery box will enable line-in recording with electret condenser mics. To use the line-in will allow for recording very high sound pressure levels with very little distortion (no preamp overload).

A little more info here:

http://forums.minidisc.org/index.php?s=&sh...indpost&p=71008

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm using a battery box these days myself, now that they're as small as the attenuator. But the headphone volume control is still a great low-cost solution.

Raf, there are two big differences between the Sharps you mentioned and Hi-MD, which is only made by Sony. Hi-MD will record in PCM--CD-quality sound--as well as compressed formats. The Sharps use compressed sound only. Hi-MD can also upload the recordings to your computer, while the Sharps would have to be recorded (out of the headphone jack) in real time. Hi-MD is the better recording solution now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

I have just got hold of an old sony R3 for £1. For a £1 I thought why not experiment. I will record the band at practice over the next few weeks. If the recording goes well I am sure I will invest in a HiMD player.

I cant believe I didnt think of using an MD player to record a year ago. A fool I am :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...