Jump to content

ATRAC3plus: 192 vs 256

Rate this topic


Sony_Fan

Recommended Posts

Is it just me or does there seem to be a little bit of distortion when you encode at 192, specially loud CDs. When you encode at 256, there seems to be almost no distortion. I just realized this as I was playing back some of my minidiscs and I'm probably going to have to re-transfer my music at 256. Distortion really bothers me, even though it's present when I convert MP3 to ATRAC3plus, but that's because my RH10 hinders MP3 playback.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear absolutley NO distrotion in either 192 or 256 (and all my library is in 192 about 500 CDs thus far) and I also notice no lack of high end (treble) on the 192k's...

And this is from listening in my pro recording studio as well...

i think it could be because of the drive used. I don't think the CD ripper in SS is very good/accurate....I always use EAC then import the WAVs....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modern codecs should be quite transparent by 192kbps (most, like Vorbis and AAC, are reaching transparency in the 130-140kbps range these days; even LAME is rated highly using the -V5 (130kbps VBR) setting). Unless AT3 really sucks, there should be very little difference between 192kbps and 256kbps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...