Soundbox Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 If you were to recommend perhaps two or three machines (or more if needed) that would set someone up to enjoy MD for a good while and be not only good to listen to but sturdy and reliable too, what would be your choices? Mine would be: 1. Sturdy portable to take on holiday, use for impromptu recordings and also link to a Hi-Fi: Sony MZ-R35 or MZ-R50 2. Player only to take whilst out travelling and also light weight: Sony MZ-E310 3. For archiving: MZ-RH1 So, what machines would you have? Ian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJ_Palmer Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Agreed on the RH1 for archiving and uploading (as long as Sonicstage still works...). With a slight Hi-MD bias, I'd also say: NH900 - for playing via line out through home stereo. This is my current home Hi-MD setup, and I'm pleasantly impressed, so much so I've dropped the idea of getting an Onkyo deck (for the present). NHF800/NH700 - for on the go. I 'need' a tuner, and the unit must take an AA battery. MZ-B10 - for easy recording and playback. Invaluable tool for music practice and other studies. JB-980 - deck (albeit legacy only) for timed/radio recording and high quality playback. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfbp Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Agreed on the RH1 for archiving and uploading (as long as Sonicstage still works...). With a slight Hi-MD bias, I'd also say: NH900 - for playing via line out through home stereo. This is my current home Hi-MD setup, and I'm pleasantly impressed, so much so I've dropped the idea of getting an Onkyo deck (for the present). NHF800/NH700 - for on the go. I 'need' a tuner, and the unit must take an AA battery. MZ-B10 - for easy recording and playback. Invaluable tool for music practice and other studies. JB-980 - deck (albeit legacy only) for timed/radio recording and high quality playback. Agree with all your assignments, especially the NH900 which is also good at recordings from said stereo. I have to say that I've been won over by the ICD-SX700 and successors in combination with Sonic Forge. For me it's all about capability. Also neither of you gents mention a car changer (or head unit). The B10 is mainly used for easy division of long performances. For example, if I could be bothered, I could divide an opera into arias. I might have to title them on the PC because lo-MD doesn't have quite enough titling space for this. But my off-radio compilations divided into songs only really worked because of the B10. Otherwise I would have pushed the buttons on some other unit to breaking, as I have seen people report here from time to time. Stephen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyjollo Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 regarding portables - anything that uses AA batteries - nothing that uses propriety batteries ( ie most of the classy stuff ). My favourite legacy portable is the Sharp MDMT88/99. nice solid alu body decent volume and play back time, takes rechargeable AAs and has a mic and optical in, had a good big clear display and very reliable( I have 3 - the first one has lasted atleast 6 years so far - I stopped counting some time ago) for HiMd the Sony NH600 - very poor display though, but decent volume, sound and battery Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfbp Posted May 30, 2010 Report Share Posted May 30, 2010 for HiMd the Sony NH600 - very poor display though, but decent volume, sound and battery I think I take the NH700 over the NH600. Both use AA but the NH700 can actually charge itself. It also has a mic input, and a bigger display. There's been a problem buying the '700 in N. America, but the UK market seems to have had plenty getting resold. None at the moment, a couple 1 week ago each around 50 quid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
md user Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 If you were to recommend perhaps two or three machines (or more if needed) that would set someone up to enjoy MD for a good while and be not only good to listen to but sturdy and reliable too, what would be your choices? So, what machines would you have? Ian A good question, and one that I tackled about a year ago. Deciding to use MDs as my 'final' music technology, and they being legacy items, I decided like many others to buy several whilst they are relatively cheap and available. After starting with two R410s (cheapest Type Rs for recording), I ended up with several Sharp SR50+ (cheap yet sturdy with good bass for playback), and a Panasonic deck for digital out. Price was my motivating factor - able to buy several units for the price of one HiMD unit - a requirement for 20 years (hopefully, if I am not being presumptuous) of enjoyment. Overall, less than the price of ONE upper-market portable when new (excluding discs). I have to say that I've been won over by the ICD-SX700 and successors in combination with Sonic Forge. For me it's all about capability. Stephen This last point has been key, though. Disks. At ~171MB each only - I started to look at cheap (again ) mp3 flash players for non-critical listening. The logic is now to record long-lasting HQ music with MD technology at ~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfbp Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 This last point has been key, though. Disks. At ~171MB each only - I started to look at cheap (again ) mp3 flash players for non-critical listening. The logic is now to record long-lasting HQ music with MD technology at ~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
md user Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Thanks for the nod. I am currently "gobsmacked" by how good the LPEC 128kbps Codec that works on the toothbrush-sized ICD recorder that I now have. MP3 doesn't come close, at higher bitrates. ... I expect I will eventually give into the flash-based world, but never to MP3. Sorry, haven't followed the discussions on LPEC; [i've been involved with family issues of late]. What is it? Another Sony proprietory? Sounds intriguing. Is it supported on other flash players? Totally agree with your view on MP3s - I find 256kb/s rate is needed MINIMUM to avoid all artefacts; 320kb/s is near to the original, but is relatively 'heavy' on the small flash players that I have. It is strange that some of the higher bit rates that you mention are actually worse than this 128 mode! Must be optimisation of the sampling frequency windows ... ? Regards, mdmad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfbp Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 I don't have objective scientific data (yet). As to the underlying technology that's a bit outside my ken, at least at the moment. But seems like this LPEC (at least in its 128k or "STHQ" incarnation) may be the latter-day successor to ATRAC. I have no clue whether any ATRAC technology went into it, what I could find on the web seemed to indicate not so. Sony's a big organization, wouldn't be surprising to me that the division that made them is separate - OTOH "ozpeter" produced this brochure listing the PCM-M10 and ICD-SXxx0 series in the same "marketspace", namely sound recording. It records nicely (on the recorder I have), and conversions to and from it seem really good. Yes, I can go to/from WAV and to/from MP3. The only thing I cannot do is to/from OMA except with SoundForge and then it's possible, but one at a time and a wee bit slow (but the result is excellent). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.