ROMBUSTERS Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 There seems to be a *lot* of alternate names for SonicStage floating around on this forum, mainly due to user disgust or appearance but every once in a while you come across a really good and downright hilarious one! Contest Rules:-post only one alternative name (pick your best)-post your reasons for using this name (i.e. personal experience, etc)-if you did not create the name, please give credit to whomeever u think created it (or UNKNOWN if u dont)-you may comment on others namesPRIZE!!!!11111!!!111-A pat on the back and a hardy job well done! (wut u think im made of money? pfft) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
me Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 (edited) SubSonicStageBecause it's slow. I could put the files on my theoretical HD3 with a magnet faster than sonic stage can. Edited January 27, 2005 by me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeriyn Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 UselessStage. Because, well, it's useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squaredcircle Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 SorryStooge . Because it's a sorry excuse for a program, and you feel like a stooge every time you use it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrius Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 SonicStale. Because it's the same thing over and over, with different faces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaotic Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 IncompatibleStage. Because it doesn't support MAC, or running natively on OS X.SucksStage. Because the software just plain SUCKS compare to Itunes, plus lousy interface. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZ-NH1 Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 Ahahahah, some nice names here!I'd call it - "1 Player to rule them all!" Because simply SS is just FANTASTIC, and always performs to its peak - 110% Nah, lol just jokes guys.I'd call it "Shit- Suh" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xispe Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 Damn I love sonicstage! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kardon Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 I dont see whats so bad. maybe im doing something wrong with it because it works great for me... hey im new. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZ-NH1 Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 Ahahaha, Kardon! I think it works pretty well for most people, except for that fact that there are so many features that Sony have left out that they could have put into this piece of software to make it easier to use for everyone.When it doesn't work, then you get extremely angry, especially if it freezes in the middle of an upload, or trashes recordings that you can't take again and all that kinda stuff that really makes it a pretty shitty, annoying piece of software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROMBUSTERS Posted January 29, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 ive actually never had it crash on me or kill anything of mine and i find it a very easy to use enjoyable experienceHOWEVERI am annoyed by the lack of certain obvious features. The most annoying one i have is the fact that you cant store multiple Atrac versions of the same song and then choose which one you would like to use at transfer time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZ-NH1 Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 It has never crashed for me either ROMBUSTERS, but I was just saying what others had said. SS works fine for me, but yes, there are features that should have been included:In Windows Media Player, you can search for new files, so that files ALREADY IN THE LIBRARY aren’t added again, in SS you can't do this to my knowledge, so if I have 2 - 3 new albums, I will have to find them in my large music collection, which is a great hassle!The other hassle for me and for many others I believe is that my music library collection is all in .mp3 format, so having to convert all my music I want for my MD to ATRA3plus is an extreme hassle.I can spend up to 3-4 hrs encoding my mp3's to ATRAC for just ONE disc :@:@, and then I have 1GB of ATRAC files on my hard drive which I would never use, and it seems that if I delete them, DD won’t be able to find the file when next uploading it to my MD, so I have to delete the file, and then re-import it :@Sorry for the long post, just had to get all my anger out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eryn Vorn Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 (edited) What about SuperSonic.Why: it's quick, safe and wonderful. Edited February 1, 2005 by Eryn Vorn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eryn Vorn Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 (edited) Edited again. Edited February 1, 2005 by Eryn Vorn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROMBUSTERS Posted January 29, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 ahahaha youve got to be kidding me sonyoh god... why is it sooooo long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZ-NH1 Posted January 30, 2005 Report Share Posted January 30, 2005 Um, can some one just let me know what that actually said ^^^^^, because there is no way I am reading all that jibberish :S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.