Jump to content

sfbp

Administrators
  • Posts

    6,672
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by sfbp

  1. Not 100% sure if this counts the same as having the machine default to SP with no disc. I suppose I am imagining writing a driver - and one has to start from certainty. Otherwise users would see different results starting with different discs... states are multiplied by 2. I agree. That was actually my intention. But I don't see them on the device list.
  2. Try going back to the way I did it. Rename all the drivers and only put their right names when the installer pops up asking for file name. Don't try out the upload until the driver list (for each NetMD device) looks clean. Another thought, have you set the RH1 in SP mode default on record before connecting it? This means that when there is no disc it defaults to NetMD operation. Maybe if it's defaulted to HiMD operation then it goes ahead and dumb-ly loads > 1 driver? Sorry, I thought this might be simple. I have 4 ports on the back of the machine (on the motherboard) and 2 more on the front. Could it be something about the way Windows manages them?
  3. Yes, I deliberately took one cable to the front of the PC, and one to the back. Judging from the list of devices on this particular machine which has always listed no less than 4 USB controllers, I think I managed to get one cable connected to each of two different controllers. Hint: USB controllers always seem to come in pairs. So if you take the socket closest (horizontal or vertical) to the one you are using, it's possible it may not work. Good luck!
  4. Is it possible that RH1's have been wearing out prematurely because of this bug?
  5. But if you plug the RH1 into one port, and the NH600 into another, you should find (as I did) that they are independent of each other, and that the RH1 NetMD device never "picks up" the 033 driver. No need to uninstall anything once you got it set up right. The older units will never cause the 052 driver to be loaded (you can see why from the .inf file). And ne'er the twain shall meet. Worse case, delete a device when it goes wrong. I plan on labelling the two cables "RH1" and "the rest"
  6. I just had a bright idea, what if we could convince the USB devices to hang off two different device chains. Then I would use one connector for the RH1 and another cable entirely for the rest. YUP, THAT WORKS! If you check, there are now 2 NetMD devices in the Device Manager List (and two NetMD's listed in SonicStage, wonders will never cease!). One of them is the RH1 and runs at full speed and has only 052 driver. The other has both 052 and 033 (not exactly sure why, someone will probably explain this) and can run the NH600 (with LP2 disk in it) quite fine. If you're not sure, please don't hesitate to ask questions. I feel like saying "Eureka!". I had all sorts of ideas about lying to the software about drivers, etc etc, but this seems to solve it. Stephen
  7. Just did a little bit of fiddling. I tried to use only two devices, RH1, and NE410, essentially the newest and the oldest (at least as far as my own ownership goes, maybe not historical) devices. Since you mention the 052 driver is for the RH1, I left it in place. But I renamed all the other three drivers in every place they could be found on my HD (a. windows\system32 b. c:\program files\sony\personal audio driver), namely NETMDUSB.SYS (to xNETMDUSB.SYS) NETMD031.SYS (etc NETMD033.SYS (etc And now I hooked up the NE410. Windows now asked for NETMDUSB.SYS So I gave it (just that one driver, by naming it back). Of course that worked (for the download to the 410). As soon as I switched back to the RH1, now we are back to x1 uploading. So now I disconnected RH1, did the trick of looking at the hidden nonpresent devices, and deleted (ONLY) BOTH NetMD devices under USB. I didn't delete anything else at all. Obviously I could simply uninstall the one whose driver is shown (by looking under properties) as NETMDUSB.SYS, leaving the NETMD052.SYS installed. Plugging the RH1 in now got a device installed (because I just deleted both devices), only one NetMD device now, the one whose driver is NETMD052.SYS. I'm not sure what the 031 and 033 are, possibly something for one of the other devices. No data yet. But it seemed the whole problem arises from the conflict of NETMDUSB.SYS and NETMD052.SYS. ( Note added: i looked inside the various .INF files and you can too, sure enough the 033 is required when I put an SP disk into my NH600; it looks like the 031 driver is only required for NE810 and AM-NX9. All the other HiMD units require 033. Then I confirmed that the 033 driver ALSO causes the 052 driver to go slow; In the driver file list for the RH1 there is now 033 as well as 052, and now it doesn't behave correctly any more. The only way to correct this is to delete the MD device and let Windows rebuild it again. ). Maybe I'll just set up a second computer for NETMD uploads with the RH1.
  8. Maybe simply renaming the driver files with a batch file (it hardly needs a program to be written) would work nicely?
  9. So this driver is exactly where to look for the hooks 1kyle and I seem to have some project to investigate. Unless you and your team of experts are able.....?
  10. Perhaps would it work to do some renaming, if some newer drivers will actually work the old units? Just a thought. (added years later): there is NOW a set of driver files in our downloads section which solves the problem for ever, and it is possible to use the 052 driver for ALL units with the updated .INF file. This was totally avoided for 64-bit because the ONLY driver we ever had for 64 bits had to be adapted to work with all the earlier units. Going back and doing the same mods to let the 052 driver install for all units meant that the problem raised by this thread no longer happens to begin with whenever a non-RH1 unit is plugged in. Note that the modified driver set is not signed by Sony (nothing we can do about that) and so each time the driver installs it will be necessary to override the warnings from Microsoft about unsigned drivers. In recent versions of Windows that warning has become more and more difficult to get around but it is still possible. Once the driver has been installed, you don't need to leave the machine in a state which accepts unsigned drivers - i.e. it is necessary to perform this decrease in security only temporarily. Note that the driver ITSELF is unchanged from Sony's version, hence the requirement to have the lowered security at install time only.
  11. Totally amazing! Well done indeed. I have (as I hinted in some other post) for years gone through and attempted to clean up the Windows device map when things got horrible, by hand, using REGEDIT. Whatamess! This finally gives a way to do it properly. as well as solving the bizarre problem of the uploader (RH1) that wouldn't upload per specifications (on speed, that is). A tip for the less-experienced at all this sort of stuff: Make sure you reboot AFTER deleting whatever devices you decide to zap. The registry isn't really flushed properly until you do so. It's the act of shutting down that makes things really permanent, Well I just did an upload at about x10, very impressive. Then I went and put in a HiMD disk to the same unit, and uploaded something from it. No problems. Finally I switched back to NetMD mode and uploaded something just to make sure the fix hadn't gone away. All worked perfectly. What I should like very much to know, is can someone come up with a cute way to allow the other devices to work without this problem. I have several different portables, and I don't really want to wear out my RH1 just to put music on to them. Can you perhaps give specifics of which drivers cause this stuff to happen? Thank you very much!!!!
  12. Quick comment: I would start with removing all traces of any earlier versions. You may even have to go to the extent of installing an old version on some machine you don't care about, then seeing what changed in the registry, in the windows directory and in the windows\system32 directory. Worst case, do it on a virtual machine so you can throw the whole experiment away (you don't need to activate a Vm copy of Windows, because you will throw it away). I'd be surprised if this didn't allow me to isolate the problem. Unfortunately I have no desire to run Vista any time soon. Bottom line: uninstall everything you can find to do with Sony/SonicStage, and also PXEngine. It's very probable you should deinstall the burning programs too, in the first instance. I don't like the sound of having to diddle with the registry to get CD or DVD burners going. Once you do that you are in deep doo-doo. Another thing is to try and clean up the device map. There are probably all sorts of CD and also USB devices that just lurk, waiting for you to reinstall something. Probably you have to get rid of all traces of them from the registry. This is a job for an expert, certainly I have only been able to do it using other people's tools that clean up the registry. There's an excellent utility from Microsoft called (argh, cannot remember) that diagnoses the WMI subsystem. Google it and you'll see - may will find some inconsistencies in your setup as a result of messing the registry.
  13. Also, don't limit your search to your home country. May have to beware on power supplies for components, but for chargers you can usually get another that works at home.
  14. this is not to discount GuitarFxr's post at all. You sound like you are getting 1 group per file instead of one track per file. Most people use the RH1 in the mode where it starts a new group every time you press Record. I don't have a Mac, so I have no idea about the software you have. But it makes me wonder if there is a configuration item to control this. Good luck! Added later: I have been thinking about this. If the software only sends one group at a time, it's a simple matter to put every track (that you already recorded) into its own group. You just need one thing: a PC!!!!!! Hook up the RH1 to the PC via the USB cable and use SonicStage to perform the manipulation. Not very intuitive (perhaps someone else can give clear instructions?) but I am pretty sure I could do the whole job in 5 minutes. I wonder if Guitarfxr was joking about sending him the disk. Once you have the tracks rearranged one per group, you can reconnect to the Mac and repeat whatever you did (the folder thingy sounds like a group icon). Sorry but you may have to copy (use cut and paste in Windows, get a PC-ophile to show you) the names of the tracks to the names of the groups if the software is stubborn. Another possibility is to look on page 56 of the manual and read how to move a given track to another group using the buttons on the RH1 itself. Another possibility is to do all the rearrangement from the Mac before the transfer (upload). I really don't know the limitations of the Mac software. Tedious and annoying but surely better than sending off and waiting 2 weeks. If there is an ongoing problem at the Mac end, you might want to reconfigure the RH1 NOT to start a new group every time. If that's a pain, forget the idea of pressing pause between takes, just start a new recording (leave the group auto-creation ON after all) by pressing the record button every single time you do and the STOP button whenever you finish a track. This new mode has two advantages to you: 1. When you stop recording, everything IS flushed to the disk, whereas I think with Pause, it is not. 2. Each track is automatically in its own group (assuming you still have group autocreation turned on on the recorder) Maybe you can use the Mac to label groups and/or tracks after creation, so forget what I said about PC - it's just that I know I could do that and it would work - so if you don't have a PC you can borrow (sigh means installing Sonic Stage!) you might do it with what you have right now, after recording but before upload. Good luck!
  15. Current Ebay listing I also know what I paid on Craigslist for my 640, but that's a bit more fancy piece of kit. Contact me by PM if you want to know. Cheers
  16. Sorry I couldn't resist having the last word... again.... because it's post #42 which as you know means the answer to Life, the Universe and Everything. To me the USB is a mere convenience. That's one reason not to trust even PCM under HiMD until there is a deck (or someone manages to hack one trivially) that plays back HiMD with optical out that can be "transferred out" to something that cannot be restricted by Sony or anyone else. The basic SP format is still very very good. Sending it to a computer via Toslink is (to me) not the last resort, but absolutely the best and only way because I know that nothing has been done to it. Just thought I'd get this one comment in..... since the thread is about Hi-MD reliability, I guess you are exactly right.
  17. Check your messages - I am taking this "offline". Ha we were writing just about the same moment, lousy minds think alike
  18. I really think that language and behaviour like this are not to be tolerated. You're the newbie here, and you come in and start insulting someone. On top of that, you're not taking any notice of any advice anyone gives, so I suggest we don't need to give you any more. FWIW, I think the paragraph by A440 about how complicated it is to do all this stuff is overblown. For someone with an ounce of technical skill these manipulations are trivial. Have a Nice Day (and I mean that in the Great American Way).
  19. Exactly. That's why I suggest comparing the transactions actually being transmitted over USB with what ends on the disk. Not sure how to do it (yet).
  20. I would echo that, and summarize my "judgements" (no facts here): 1. SP is as good as you will ever get, the compression is essentially broadcast quality 2. MD is for sure better than tape of any kind (no hiss, wow/flutter) and same or better freq response, as long as you don't use LP-anything. So Hi-MD 256K is a fine format. 3. For quality and reliability, choose SP and do it in 80-minute chunks. Forget about the RH1, realtime out from a Deck's optical to computer optical in is as good as any CD. With the RH1 you only get realtime uploads of SP anyway (though i have seen claims of faster). 4. For length of recording and ease of upload, use Hi-MD 256K, and save as WAV files (automated option on SonicStage). 5. If you want to use expensive XLR Mics, the HHB portathingy is really your only pro option. There's no pro HiMD deck, and the consumer HiMD deck (Onkyo) has no optical out, so now you have to use something else to get the data into your 'puter. Good luck!
  21. So there are two possibilities: 1. there's a code embedded in the device. In which case either a service manual or a firmware update (if such exists) ought to allow us to figure it out; or 2. the USB traffic will show the special stuff going to the NetMD/HiMD. Hacking the driver is a secondary issue, because the first thing to do is to identify what is being sent just by looking at it. I have no idea about USB sniffers, but I bet they exist. Isn't that where to attack it?
  22. Good to see you back. Verrrry interesting!!!! (yup I tried the simple experiment now) So it follows that when SS copies files to the MD directory it does so using some special undocumented call. Maybe even some encryption keys, but something has to be able to decode those, and the resultant disk is playable anywhere, right? So: either the driver needs a magic password, or every SS-created disk has something in it that every single MD firmware ever created must know about. Right? Stephen
  23. sfbp

    "IPod Police"

    First off, I'm not sure which legislation you are referring to. As an American, the Canadian legislation doesn't affect you unless you cross our borders. Assuming you mean the Canadian Bill C-61 (replacing the in-force C-60 which has the levy provision as a way of distributing some money to struggling Canadian artists), it's far from passed. There has been uproar here. I personally think that we should be getting excited about what's going on in Zimbabwe, or in pre-Olympic China, or Darfur, Afghanistan or any number of places, but that's my personal position. Second off, I think the legislation here has been introduced under incredible pressure from the US music and movie lobby amid all sorts of veiled government threats about losing NAFTA, and making it more difficult for traffic (tourists, truckers and all) to flow in either direction. After all, we are the USA's #1 business partner, and vice-versa. I think (personal unsubstantiated opinion follows) the drafters of the legislation knew the public (and the parliamentarians who represent it) wouldn't stand for it, and largely followed the US model knowing said legislation will fail, so that they can say "we tried". Informed academic opinion (law professors etc) is firmly against the bill and firmly in favour of the status quo, or perhaps other measures. Third off (and this is where the lobbying efforts sometimes bear fruit) there have been all sorts of trumpetings about Canada being the source of all piracy owing to some petty crooks stealing bad copies of movies with a camcorder, whereas in reality, the numbers are but a drop in the bucket, and may even serve to popularize the pirated movie(s). I don't have the reference to hand. So all in all, yes it's absurd to make it illegal to: a. own and operate a "foreign" DVD player b. rip tracks onto CD (but not sell them, that part is "not cricket" as far as I am concerned and the law agrees) c. time-shift/archive/mediaconvert material that you own or (under the current laws) have the right to access. Finally the (Canadian) Government has assured us that it will not itself get involved in prosecution of malefactors under the new highly restrictive provisions. Since the Govt operates our borders, I see no way that anything like the "IPod Police" could get to be. However I can easily see it at airports going into US customs - the INS/DHS guys enforce far more laws on those rash enough to want to enter the USA than they ever enforce on their own citizens. And in the US there is a much closer link between big corporations and Government. All in all I agree with everything you say about the RIAA/MPAA and their efforts to force this kind of corporate silliness down the throats of Canadian consumers. Bobt, don't worry. The earliest any of this might happen in Canada is November, I think. Meantime I plan to spend some effort opposing the internet throttling that's happening in Ontario. As a software author, I am not in favour of (99% illegal) peer to peer sharing of unlimited content (software, music, video) that triggered this brownout. But dragging the whole internet down and checking every packet to try and shut down specific illegal applications will probably never work. And I applaud the decision to attempt to place curbs on oil speculation, which some folks have now admitted what I guessed a month ago, is mainly responsible for the cries of "Peak Oil". Wow, we are getting a long way from MD. Time to pull back.... Stephen
  24. Not Hi-MD but perhaps you are unaware of the pro line from HHB http://www.minidisc-canada.com/shopexd.asp?id=357 Cheers
  25. http://forums.minidisc.org/index.php?showtopic=21145 I would be inclined to install Nero, rather than Roxio, before SS. But either might work. I recently found a nasty problem with Windows recognizing CDs but not DVDs on one machine. Turned out to be hardware, because the CD and DVD functions use 2 different lasers, and only one was broken. At the current drive prices the easiest was to replace the drive. No reason to suppose that this might be your problem, however I imagine it's just possible you have a drive that reads DVD but not CD. Take a look here, also http://forums.support.roxio.com/index.php?showtopic=20482 If you can read CDs and or DVDs but not write one or other, the problem is more likely to be to do with the UDF reader. That's the driver component that allows raw access to an unformatted, writeable disk. This is just from poking around on the internet, but I think it's possible that the file PxHelp20.sys may be at the root of all these problems, assuming your hardware is ok. Hope this helps. Attached to this post is a driver list of one of my drives. This happens to be DVD and CD read, CD-only writer. See if your driver list looks like this.
×
×
  • Create New...