sonic_rage Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 Ive been trying to master setting the equalizer on my hi-md and was wondering how hi-md users here set their bands for particular genres.Would anyone care to give me some tips on how to set the bands for music like Trance, D&B, Rock, etc.right now im using my brand new EX71 headphones and they sure as hell sound very tinny to me with too much treble; maybe that's my problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poodle Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 I like my sounds on the 'bright' side, so I usually set the mids and treble up and the bass not so much (on both Hi-MD RH910 and NW-HD5).Currently I have:Custom 1: +0 +2 +1 + 2 + 3 + 2Custom 2: +1 +1 +2 + 3 + 3 + 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenmachine Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 The tinny sound is a sign of a non-fitting air-seal, which can't be easily compensated by equalization. Even if you could, the EQ's lowest frequency of 100 Hz is pretty useless, something in the 60 Hz range would have been much better imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 The tinny sound is a sign of a non-fitting air-seal, which can't be easily compensated by equalization. Even if you could, the EQ's lowest frequency of 100 Hz is pretty useless, something in the 60 Hz range would have been much better imo. I have Custom1 with bass at +2 on all my units. I must say I'm a bit lazy and generally tend to leave at this setting whatever the genre I'm listening to, be it jazz, classical, electronic... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 I encourage these types of discussions because there is far too much equalizer bashing across the 'net. I think choosing coloration that is pleasing to your ears should be a standard; to believe that we all have ears that can find the default settings with no equalizer acceptable is absurd. Everyone is different with hearing and what is considered satisfactory cannot be regulated. I like +3 +2 +1 + 2 + 3 + 4 on the NW-HD3 I listen to.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJ_Palmer Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 (edited) ^ That's very symmetric at least, Chris... (Actually, can you go up to 4?)It varies, but right now my HD5 is set at +1 +2 +2 +2 +3 +2 (Custom EQ1)+2 +3 +2 +2 +3 +3 (Custom EQ2)Earphones: Sennheiser MX550Strange that no-one seems to use go into the negative range... Edited November 9, 2005 by KJ_Palmer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenmachine Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 You should also mention what kind of headphones you use. Some might sound pleasing to your ears without EQ, the majority propably won't and require individual corrections. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 (edited) Good point. I employ EX81's primarily, but I think I'm entering a phase where headphones aren't agreeable with me anymore; I've been finding myself listening to my computer speaker setup alot as of late. I don't even mess with the EQ in fb2k, too much tweaking can be done in that program and it becomes incessant. Edited November 9, 2005 by kurisu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlowMo Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 custom 1 is fitted for my earphones (raise in the lows), custom 2 for my active speakers at my parents' (raise in the highs), no eq for listening on my home hifi set. i used to change the settings a lot more when my remote display wasn't broke yet, now i mostly leave it how it is.so i use the eq to adapt different speakers/phones to sound at least a little more similar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJ_Palmer Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 Yes, I dont use any EQ on my home systems when I listen through headphones or speakers. That includes MD or CD decks or bookshelf system. Only portable units seem to need or benefit from EQ when listening though headphones. Even through portables 'line out' and a home amp I never need to use anything other than a flat response... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonic_rage Posted November 9, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 After switching to Hi-MD ive noticed myself always changing the EQ for different types of music, but when i was using my netMD, the default setting for "sound 2" sounded great for every type of music! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haybrd Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 On my NH900:+2, +1, 0, +1, 0, 0, (Sony standard issue headphones)Like Kurisu said, I just set this to my personal preference (whilst listening to a favourite song). I have never changed it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrazyIvan Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 (edited) For most music I use Custom:+3 +2 +2 +1 +2 +3 on EX71's with NHF800+2 +2 0 +1 +3 +3 on Pana HJE50's with the same unitSometimes I'll swith to the Jazz setting or Unique when I want a little more mid. Mostly I like bass. Edited November 9, 2005 by KrazyIvan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chriswyatt Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 I use 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0. Gives my NH700 with my EX71s a little bass boost. I used to have it slightly dipped at the end too to remove some treble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMPlitude Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 if im remembering correctly, my custom 1 is at 3,2,-1,-1,2,3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Low Volta Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 (edited) with NH900 and pana's RP-JE50's it's at: +2, +2, +1, 0, 0, +1just a bit more bass (for that warm/full sound) and a thad of treble (as it would otherwise drown in the lower frequencies too much)... the mids are mostly strong enough by themselves *edit: forget about this... look 7 and 8 posts further and learn why!! Edited January 2, 2006 by The Low Volta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deanage Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Strange that no-one seems to use go into the negative range...You're not wrong. Ask most people what sort of eq setting they have on their home system and it's usually more or less a "V" shape to compensate for the human ear's ability to hear mid-range (3-8Khz give or take), louder than, say, low range (500Hz>). Most human voices are in the mid range though...I think it's got something to do with people using ear/headphones rather than putting it through speakers.Also, I use no EQ. 6 bands isn't enough adjustment for me but hey, horses for courses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_THE_CROW Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 with cracked european MZ-NH600 and in-ear Panasonic headphones at:-3, -3, -3, -3, 0, +3at Volume levels 100 % i used to listen mostly all of my MONO techno, dance, trance, euro dance, electric, rave, rap, jungle, drum n bass, michael jackson etc....thats ok...but now i use cracked CREATIVE ZEN XTRA 30 GB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FezzFest Posted November 14, 2005 Report Share Posted November 14, 2005 On my MZ-N710 Cutsom1: +1 0 0 0 0 0On my MZ-RH710 Custom1: +2 +1 0 0 0 0bass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streaml1ne Posted November 14, 2005 Report Share Posted November 14, 2005 flat, MDR-SA5000, MDR-D66, MDR-7509The 7509s have a different signature that I suppose you could EQ around, but I find their extra midrange pleasant on some music as is. The SA5000's and D66's don't need EQ'ing to my ear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yanouche Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 +2 -3 -1 -2 -2 -1in summer: koss porta proin winter: grado sr60 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faelnor Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 At this time, +1 +1 0 -1 +1 0 on my new MDR-Q66(LW), but I didn't have time to tune it much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenmachine Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 Although my headphones (MDR-CD470) sound rather linear in the mid-range, i feel that they benefit from a little low and high frequency boost. My new favorite setting is (-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0). See also this thread why i prefer negative values:http://forums.minidisc.org/index.php?showtopic=13741 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Low Volta Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 thanks to greenmachine's insights my new fav eq'ing is now [0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1] as this gives a bit more bass and a warm/full sound... great!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dex Otaku Posted January 3, 2006 Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 Knowing pretty well what flat sounds like, I usually set my EQ to meet approximately that and then compensate a bit for my hyperacusis by cutting the 2nd highest band slightly more than the rest. A lot of the music I listen to I'm already well aware of the sonic attributes of [with some after more than 20 years of listening], so I know reasonably well what to compensate for. I think posting my EQ settings would be pretty useless though, because they're completely different for each set of 'phones and even with my 'general' setting for each set I still compensate for individual albums according to my personal preferences and the need to avoid pain caused by hyperacusis.I don't see anything wrong with EQs either, myself. I personally never use them for additive processing, having come from the school of "passive is better" and actually having the ability to hear clipping distortion caused by EQing too much in the positive in any given band. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hombre Posted January 3, 2006 Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 Thanks Greenmachine; I had to try (0,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1) setting and found that records(vinyl)sounded much better. I like this setting. Nomally I listen to everything flat but, I using cheap headphones EX-71's and they are a bit bright and a little tubby in the bass. Of course this is a intital reaction but I will give it a week of listening to see if it sticks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.